Comments on: Sexier? http://anniee.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/sexier/ Just another WordPress.com weblog Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:23:09 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Opposer http://anniee.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/sexier/#comment-44 Opposer Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:23:09 +0000 http://anniee.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/sexier/#comment-44 Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway ... nice blog to visit. cheers, Opposer. Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation :) Anyway … nice blog to visit.

cheers, Opposer.

]]> By: mattbear http://anniee.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/sexier/#comment-32 mattbear Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:55:22 +0000 http://anniee.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/sexier/#comment-32 I would suspect it was more a play on the rise of the "sexy librarian" image, which doesn't really refer to librarians at all, but rather a look or style. I can see where one might get offended being compared to an object, and it certainly comes across sexist. But honestly, I doubt the ad company put as much thought into this as the librarians seem to be. I would suspect it was more a play on the rise of the “sexy librarian” image, which doesn’t really refer to librarians at all, but rather a look or style.

I can see where one might get offended being compared to an object, and it certainly comes across sexist. But honestly, I doubt the ad company put as much thought into this as the librarians seem to be.

]]>